![]() ![]() From these, it becomes clear that being able to remove evidence of your presence, however it is done (no sound, no visual cues, whatever), gives a +2 bonus. For instance, elves and halflings get a +2 bonus to surprise opponents under certain circumstances, because they can move silently. ** Actually, this is never spelled out in the rules, but it can be derived from other information. * No, you can't move silently and hide in shadows at the same time. (This is also made clear in the rules.) The enemy will see such blatant moves every time. A thief who began the combat by hiding in the shadows is not an active participant until he attacks, but a thief who attacked or otherwise acted for a few rounds cannot decide to hide in the shadows later. In normal combat, it is assumed that all active participants are in view, barring special circumstances. ![]() (Consider, for instance, a situation in which not all combatants can see each other.) The DM is free to adjudicate this depending on the circumstances. It is unlikely that a thief will be able to back stab multiple times in an encounter, because once he reveals himself his opponents are aware of him. If surprise occurs, the attack gains the back stab bonus to hit and damage, which depends on the level of the thief. If surprise is not achieved, the attack is rolled normally. A thief moving silently from behind, or hiding in shadows as the victim passes*, achieves a +2 bonus to surprise the victim.** (This usually results in a 4 in 6 chance of surprise.) Next, when the victim is in attack range, the victim must make a surprise check. It's impossible to back stab if you're carrying a torch in the corner of the room. Some people skip this bit, but the rules are pretty clear: the victim must fail a surprise check.įirst, the victim must be unaware of the thief. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |